ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complication of SARS-CoV-2 disease, associated with worse clinical outcomes. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in combination with sequential extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) might support renal function, attenuate systemic inflammation, and prevent or mitigate multiple organ dysfunctions. Method(s): We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients admitted in ICU for ARDS and who developed moderate-to-severe AKI requiring RRT. Cytokine hemadsorption with Cytosorb was performed in association with CRRT. The main indication for this treatment was the worsening of hemodynamic and respiratory conditions and suspicion of cytokine storm. The protocol consisted in the use of 3-4 cartridges in total;among these, the first 2 were changed after 12 hours of treatment to maximize cytokine removal, while the others after 24 hours. We examined comorbidities, clinical and laboratory characteristics and the impact of treatment in terms of mortality rate and changes in data before and after treatment. Result(s): Nineteen patients (95%) had an AKI at any time during their ICU stay. Of these, 5 patients (25%) had AKI stage II and 14 patients (70%) had AKI stage III. All patients included in this subgroup were mechanical ventilated and required vasopressor's use. Mean prescribed CRRT dose was 31.2 +/- 11.7 ml/kg/h. The median time to strating RRT after ICU admission was 7 days (IQR 3.5-15 days) and the median duration was 7 days (IQR 2.5-12.5 days). Mean SOFA score at the time of RRT start was extremely high (14.5 +/- 2.8). Mortality rate was important (18 patients, 90%) in our cohort. Comparing clinical and laboratory data before and after treatment, a significant improvement of inflammatory markers was reported, with the reduction of C-reactive protein (CRP, 143 [62.1- 328.5] vs 83.5 [66.7-153.5] mg/L);however, no significant changes in IL-6, WBC and PCT values were observed. A slight increase of PaO2/FiO2 were described, although not statistically significant (PaO2/FiO2 ratio 144 [82.7-174.2] vs 183 [132-355.5] mmHg). Conclusion(s): Our experience supports the need of an adequate timing for the use of Cytosorb in critically ill patients with Covid-19. Although a discrete efficacy in improving inflammatory cascade, the late use of EBPT, when organ dysfunction was already ongoing, didn't impact survival.
ABSTRACT
Background: Recently, the role of IL-6 in IgAN pathogenesis is becoming increasingly important. A possible hypothesis emerges from our recent work on genomewide DNA methylation screening in patients with IgAN, which identified, among other findings, a hypermethylated region comprising Vault 2-1 RNA (VTRNA2-1), a non-RNA coding also known as a precursor of miR-886 (pre-mi-RNA). Consistently, VTRNA2-1 expression was found downregulated in IgAN patients. Method(s): Total RNA were isolated from PBMCs of IgAN patients, transplanted IgAN patients (TP-IgAN), non-IgAN transplanted patients (TP) and healthy subjects (HS). VTRNA2-1, CREB, PKR and IL-6 were evaluated by RT-PCR and by ELISA. Poly (I:C) and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 COMIRNATY vaccine were used to transfect patient PBMCs. PKR inhibitor imoxin (C16) 1 muM was used to stimulate patient PBMCs. Result(s): Here we confirm that VTRNA2-1 is low expressed in IgAN subjects compared to HS and we found that also in TP-IgAN, compared to TP, the VTRNA2-1 transcript was expressed at level very low. We found that in IgAN patients with downregulated VTRNA2-1, PKR is overactivated, coherently with the role of the VTRNA2-1 that binds to PKR and inhibits its phosphorylation. The loss of the VTRNA2-1 natural restrain caused the activation of CREB by PKR, a classical cAMPinducible CRE-binding factor interacting with a region of the IL-6 promoter and leading to IL-6 production. We found higher CREB phosphorylation levels and IL-6 levels both in IgAN and in TP-IgAN patients. Since PKR is normally activated by bacterial and viral RNA, we hypothesized that these microorganisms can further activate the PKR/CREB/ IL-6 pathway leading to an excess of IL-6 production, explaining both the high levels of IL-6, both infection involvement in the disease, both cases of IgAN associated with COVID-19 infection and with COVID-19 RNA-vaccination. Both the RNA poly(I:C) and the COVID-19 RNA-vaccine stimulation significantly increase the IL-6 levels in IgAN patient PBMCs. Conclusion(s): In conclusion, the discovery of the upregulated VTRNA2-1/PKR/ CREB/IL-6 pathway in IgAN patients may provide a new pathogenic mechanism in IgAN and may be useful for the development of novel therapeutic approaches, likely by modulating the VTRNA2-1 methylation level in IgAN patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Replication of the enveloped SARS-COV2 virus can alter lipidomic composition and metabolism of infected cells [1]. These alterations commonly result in a decline in HDL, total cholesterol and LDL, and an increase in triglyceride levels in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, the 'cytokine storm' subsequent to release of inflammatory cytokines can severely impair lipid homeostasis. Importantly, decreased HDL-cholesterol correlates with severity of COVID-19 infection and represents a significant prognostic factor in predicting poor clinical outcomes [2]. Similarly, it has been observed that COVID-19 patients' recovery is accompanied by a rise in serum HDL levels. Pharmacological intervention that aims to restore ApoA-1 or functional HDL particles may have beneficial roles for clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients and has recently been approved for compassionate use [3]. SARS-CoV 2 spike proteins S1 and S2 can bind free cholesterol and HDL-bound cholesterol, facilitating virus entry by binding the ACE2 co-receptor Scavenger Receptor-BI (SR-BI) [4]. When activated at the trans-membrane level, SR-BI signalling culminates in Ser1173-eNOS phosphorylation with both anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effect. We hypothesized that SARS-COV2 binding promoted SR-BI internalization, so that it could not exert its essential protective function. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of CER-001, a mimetic HDL, in antagonizing this process. METHOD: Endothelial and tubular (RPTEC) cells were exposed to S1, S2 and S1 + S2 (50-250 nM) with or without CER-001 (CER-001 50-500 ug/mL) and cholesterol (10-50 uM). Apoptosis tests (MTT and AnnV/PI) were performed. Internalization of SR-BI, ACE2 with S1 and activation of eNOS was evaluated by FACS analysis. SR-BI and ACE2 expression were evaluated on kidney biopsies from COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: At concentrations used, the exposition of S1, S2 and S1 + S2 in the presence of CER-001 and cholesterol did not induce apoptosis of endothelial cells and RPTEC. Endothelial and tubular cells stimulated by S1, in presence of cholesterol, showed an increased intracellular level of SR-BI and ACE-2, with significantly reduced eNOS phosphorylation compared to baseline (P < 0.05). The treatment with CER-001 reversed trans-membrane SR-BI levels and eNOS phosphorylation to baseline values. The detection of S1 spike protein by endothelial cells immunohistochemistry revealed an increased level in S1-exposed cells with cholesterol and reduced S1 intracellular positive staining in CER-001-exposed cells (P < 0.05). Interestingly, S1-exposed cells without cholesterol appeared not to be capable of mediating S1 spike protein internalization. Consistent with in vitro results, analysis of renal biopsies from COVID-19 patients with proteinuria showed increased SR-BI and ACE-2 cytoplasmic signals and reduced expression at the apical domain of injured tubules. CONCLUSION: Our data confirmed the key role of lipid profile in SARS-COV2 infection, evaluating the molecular signalling involved in HDL metabolism and inflammatory processes, and could offer new therapeutic strategies for COVID-19 patients. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 infection in solid organ transplant recipients (SOT) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to comorbidities and immunosuppression state (Chaudhry ZS et al, 2020). Although vaccines represent the greatest hope to control COVID-19 pandemic, several studies showed the low immunogenicity of a two-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine regimen in SOT as compared with general population (Boyarsky BJ et al, 2021). Based on this evidence, on September 2021, the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) authorized a third vaccine administration as additional primary dose to immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the seroconversion rate after the third dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and to investigate the baseline factors associated with the absence of the antibody response. METHOD: we performed a prospective and observational study on a monocentric cohort of 329 consecutive Caucasian KTRs given three doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. Key exclusion criteria were a previous history of COVID-19 infection and transplantation or having underwent chemotherapy treatment within the last year. Antibody response against the spike protein was tested on blood sample collected before the administration of vaccine (T0), at 15 and 90 days after the second dose (T2 and T3, respectively) and one month after the third dose (T5). The level of antibodies was assessed using the Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S enzyme immunoassay (positive cut-off ≥ 0.8 U/mL). A total of 22 patients were excluded from the analysis because categorized as SARS-CoV-2-pre-immunized according to the antibodies' baseline status (T0) above the positivity cut-off. The Local Ethics Committees approved the study protocol and written informed consent was obtained before enrolment. RESULTS: The study population of 307 KTRs was 57.10 ± 13.10 years, with a predominance of male sex (64.2%). Median time from transplantation to vaccine was 10 [IQR 5-17] years. Blood analysis at baseline revealed mean eGFR assessed by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation to be 56.95 ± 23.04 mL/min/1.73 m2. The standard immunosuppressive regimen consisted of glucocorticoids in all patients, calcineurin inhibitors (88.6% of patients), antimetabolites (73.3% of patients) and mTOR inhibitors (in 15.6% of patients). The first two doses were administered 21 days apart, and the third dose was administrated 172 ± 4 days after the second dose. In our cohort, 43.3% patients (133/307) responded to the vaccine at T2. The proportion of responders increased to 68.4% (186/272) at T3 (median antibody level: 5.2 [0.40-74.07]). One month after the third dose, a positive antibody titer was detected in 251 of 307 patients (81.8%) (median antibody titre: 1137.50 [9.32- 4189.75]). The response curve starting at T2 and increasing at T3 makes apparent that there is a distinctive kinetic of humoral response in immunocompromised patients compared to immunocompetent individuals (Walsh EE et al., 2020). A multivariate analysis showed that the negative response to the third primary dose was associated with antimetabolite immunosuppressants (P = .001), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (P < .001) and female sex (P = .04) (Figure 1). No serious adverse events were reported. Neither De novo DSAs nor change in proteinuria were reported after vaccination. The limitation of this study is the absence of assays for cellular immune response. CONCLUSION: Although the exact threshold of antibody titer for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear, the ability of the additional mRNA COVID- 19 vaccine dose to increase both immune response (Figure 2A) and the prevalence of seroconversion rate (Figure 2B) associated with the acceptable safety profile supports its use after an initial 2-dose mRNA COVID-19 primary vaccine series in immunocompromised patients. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is pressuring healthcare systems worldwide. Disease outcomes in certain subgroups of patients, such as nephropathic patients, are still scarce. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and on haemodialysis (HD) are at risk of a more severe disease course and worst outcomes. Here, we aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of CKD and HD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, admitted to the Covid Nephrology Unit in the first three pandemic waves, analysing mortality rate and risk factors for mortality in this subgroup of patients. METHOD: A Covid Nephrology Unit was organized in March 2020 to manage the high number of CKD and HD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Several 'spoke' units were also set to manage HD asymptomatic patients (Hi Hotel and 'Villa Luce' Dialysis Center) or with mild symptoms ('Miulli Hospital'-Acquaviva delle Fonti and 'Fallacara Hospital'-Triggiano). Clinical and laboratory data in several timepoints were collected using electronic medical records. Primary outcome was to assess the mortality rate. Moreover, we analysed the trend of inflammatory markers in the first 7 days after hospital admission between survivors and non-survivors;finally, risk factors for mortality were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: From March 2020 to May 2021, a total of 221 patients were admitted to the Covid Nephrology Unit;among these, 112 patients on chronic haemodialysis, 21 with acute kidney injury (AKI), 58 with CKD, 24 kidney transplant recipients and 6 patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Median age was 71 years (IQR 62.5- 80), while male gender predominated (61.5%). Main comorbidities were arterial hypertension (81%), diabetes mellitus (41.8%) and cardiovascular disease (CVD, 60.6%). At admission, 13.2% of patients required non-invasive ventilatory (NIV) support (CPAP, BiPAP) and about 60% presented interstitial pneumonia at CT scan. A total of 80 patients (36.1%) died during hospital stay with a medium length of stay of 15.8 days. In the first 7 days, 29 patients presented respiratory failure requiring transfer to ICU. Conversely, 100 patients were discharged at home, while 48 patients were transferred to the spoke units (39 patients at Miulli and Fallacara Hospitals, 9 patients at Hi Hotel). Compared to survivors, patients who died were older (median age 75.5 versus 66 years, P < .001), characterized by more comorbidities (diabetes mellitus 54.5% versus 35.2%, P = .01;CVD 81.1% versus 51.4%, P < .001;chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 41.5% versus 19%, P = .01;peripheral vasculopathy 58.4% versus 34.2%, P = .01) and more severe respiratory compromission at hospital admission (patients in NIV, 22.6% versus 8.1%, P = .005). As shown in Table 1, in the first 7 days of hospital stay, a significant increase in WBC (8.29 versus 12.6 × 106, P < .001) was described in the non-survivor group;similarly, inflammatory markers such as CRP and IL-6 did not improve in the non-survivors at day 7 (CRP 81.8 versus 85.7 mg/L, P = .62;IL-6 63.1 versus 79.4 pg/mL, P = .84), while they significantly improved in survivors (median CRP 42.5 versus 10.1 mg/L, P < .001;median IL-6 32.3 versus 13.7 pg/mL, P = .01). In a multivariate logistic regression model, age (OR 1.062, 95% CI 1.007-1.119, P = .025), history of CVD (OR 8.308, 95%CI 1.704- 40.499, P = .009) and dyspnoea at hospital admission (OR 9.465, 95%CI 1.231-72.79, P = .031) were associated with risk of mortality in this population. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study analyzing characteristics and outcomes of CKD and hemodialysis patients to date. A wide heterogeneity of severity of disease has been documented in our cohort;we documented a higher mortality rate in this cohort of patients compared to general population. The presence of several comorbidities, a more severe disease at hospital admission and the persistence of elevated inflammatory markers during hospital stay are risk factors for mortality. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background and aims: Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have been considered as an extremely vulnerable population in respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to assess the incidence and lethality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in different organ transplant settings using the liver as a comparator. Methods: In this nationwide population-based study we compared the crude incidence and lethality rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection [95% Bonferroni adjusted CI (Ba-CI)] among Italian LTRs as compared to non-liver SOTRs and to general population. The following independent groups had been compared: Italian general population, all SOTRs, liver transplant recipients (LTRs) and non-Liver SOTRs in area with different incidence of infection. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and lethality rate ratio (LRR) was assessed. Community risk exposures in transplant settings were assessed. Results: From February 21 to June 22, 2020, there were 450 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections over 14168 LTRs (n=89) and 29815 non-liver SOTRs (n= 361). A significantly lower risk of infection [IRR 0.56 (Ba-CI 0.34-0.92), 0.45 (Ba-CI 0.26-0.79), 0.52 (Ba-CI 0.36-0.75)] and a lower lethality rate ratio [(LRR 0.61 (Ba-CI 0.23-1.57), 0.37 (0.08-1.76), 0.52 (0.23-1.18] was found among LTRs as compared to non-liver SOTRs in the three areas. Excluding Lombardy, the risk of infection and lethality in LTRs was lower compared to general population. Non-Liver SOTRs showed an increased risk of infection and lethality at all geographic levels compared to general population. No significant difference in the adherence to mitigation policies was found. Conclusions: Liver transplantation was associated with a significantly lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and lethality in respect to non-liver solid organ transplants. A separate evaluation of organ-specific risk stratification analysis and vaccination responses in transplant population is needed.
ABSTRACT
Recent investigations have shown that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is able to resist on the surfaces and that the diffusion occurs through droplets that can remain suspended in the air as an aerosol. The ozone generated in situ from oxygen is an active ingredient with a 'biocidal' action, but little is known about its capacity to inactivate specifically SARS-CoV-2. Here we show, for the first time, the efficiency of the ozone treatment to neutralize the SARS-CoV-2 present in nasopharynx secretion samples with high viral load. Our data show that ozone is effective in SARS-CoV-2 elimination.
ABSTRACT
The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulting in acute respiratory disease, is a worldwide emergency. Because recently it has been found that SARS-CoV is dependent on host transcription factors (TF) to express the viral genes, efforts are required to understand the molecular interplay between virus and host response. By bioinformatic analysis, we investigated human TF that can bind the SARS-CoV-2 sequence and can be involved in viral transcription. In particular, we analysed the key role of TF involved in interferon (IFN) response. We found that several TF could be induced by the IFN antiviral response, specifically some induced by IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) and by unphosphorylated ISGF3, which were found to promote the transcription of several viral open reading frame. Moreover, we found 22 TF binding sites present only in the sequence of virus infecting humans but not bat coronavirus RaTG13. The 22 TF are involved in IFN, retinoic acid signalling and regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II, thus facilitating its own replication cycle. This mechanism, by competition, may steal the human TF involved in these processes, explaining SARS-CoV-2's disruption of IFN-I signalling in host cells and the mechanism of the SARS retinoic acid depletion syndrome leading to the cytokine storm. We identified three TF binding sites present exclusively in the Brazilian SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant that may explain the higher severity of the respiratory syndrome. These data shed light on SARS-CoV-2 dependence from the host transcription machinery associated with IFN response and strengthen our knowledge of the virus's transcription and replicative activity, thus paving the way for new targets for drug design and therapeutic approaches.